1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 103 F.Supp.2d
  5. 103 F.Supp.2d 379 (2000)
 

LIFESCAN, INC. v. HOME DIAGNOSTICS, INC.

No. Civ.A. 96-597-JJF.

103 F.Supp.2d 379 (2000)

LIFESCAN, INC., Plaintiff, v. HOME DIAGNOSTICS, INC., and MIT Development Corp., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

June 20, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Kirk of Morris, James Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, DE, Philip S. Johnson, Dianne B. Elderkin, Joseph Lucci, Barbara L. Mullin, and Lynn A. Malinoski, of Woodcock Washburn Kurtz MacKiewicz & Norris LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for, plaintiff.

Arthur G. Connolly, Jr., Arthur G. Connolly, III, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, DE, Michael L. Donovan, Paul S. Roselund, Peter J. Whalen and Anne Marie Heimberger, Hancock Rothert & Bunshoft LLP, San Francisco, CA, for defendants.

OPINION

FARNAN, Chief Judge.

This action was brought by Plaintiff, LifeScan Inc., against Defendants, Home Diagnostics, Inc. and MIT Development Corp., for infringement of U.S. Patent Number 5,049,487 (the "'487 Patent"). Defendants raised a number of defenses to Plaintiff's allegations of infringement, including a claim that the '487 Patent is unenforceable due to Plaintiff's inequitable conduct before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the "PTO...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases