1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 78 F.Supp.2d
  5. 78 F.Supp.2d 402 (2000)
 

BOYKINS v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. Civ.A. 99-2458.

78 F.Supp.2d 402 (2000)

Theodis BOYKINS, Plaintiff, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

January 10, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Niza M. Motola, Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, Philadelphia, PA, for Theodis A. Boykins, plaintiff.

Theodis A. Boykins, Reading, PA, plaintiff pro se.

David S. Fryman, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews and Ingersoll, Philadelphia, PA, Niza M. Motola, Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, Philadelphia, PA, for Lucent Technologies Inc., defendant.

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

Pro se plaintiff, Theodis Boykins, brought this employment discrimination action against the defendant, Lucent Technologies, Inc., pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act ("PHRA"), 43 Pa. Stat.Ann. §§ 951 et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Specifically, plaintiff claims that defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases