1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 278 A.D.2d
  5. 278 A.D.2d 191 (2000)
 

COFFEY v. BRODSKY

278 A.D.2d 191 (2000)

716 N.Y.S.2d 902

GENEVIEVE COFFEY, Respondent, v. WILLIAM BRODSKY, Individually and Doing Business as BROAD-SKY PROPERTIES, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided December 4, 2000.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant, William Brodsky, individually and d/b/a Broad-Sky Properties is not aggrieved by the order which granted the plaintiff's motion to add Rockhill Building Corporation as an additional defendant under the relation-back doctrine (see, Poulard v Papamihlopoulos, 254 A.D.2d 266). Accordingly, the appeal must...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases