1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 105 F.Supp.2d
  5. 105 F.Supp.2d 346 (2000)
 

UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. v. CHROMALLOY GAS TURBINE CORP.

No. Civ.A. 95-444-RRM.

105 F.Supp.2d 346 (2000)

UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CHROMALLOY GAS TURBINE CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

June 29, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Kirk, Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Donald E. Scott, Bartlit, Beck, Herman, Palenchar & Scott, Denver, Colorado, Jason L. Peltz, Andrew L. Goldman, Bartlit, Beck, Herman, Palenchar & Scott, Chicago, Illinois, for plaintiff.

William J. Wade, John T. Dorsey, Jeffrey L. Moyer, Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Delaware, Howard B. Comet, David Lender, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY, Michael G. Scheininger, Daniel E. Johnson, McKenna & Cuneo, Washington, DC, for defendant.

OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

This is a commercial dispute. Plaintiff United Technologies Corporation manufactures gas turbine engines for commercial aircraft. Defendant Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corporation repairs engines manufactured by United. In 1975, United began licensing its patented technology to Chromalloy for use in repairing engines manufactured by United.

On July 11, 1995, United filed a complaint against Chromalloy in this court for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases