The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. The evidence warranted the conclusion that defendant broke the windows on both vehicles in question, and stole property from inside both vehicles without the permission or authority of the owners.
The court properly rejected, as untimely, defendant's request for a missing witness charge concerning the owner of the second vehicle defendant was charged with damaging, since the request was made after the completion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.