The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility.
Although the court should have granted defendant's request for a "falsus in uno" charge concerning the jury's option to disregard the entire testimony of a witness who has intentionally testified falsely as to a material fact (see, People v Johnson,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.