Substantial evidence supports respondent's finding that petitioner's admitted failure, in his first official departmental interview, to give an accurate account of his role in the matter under investigation was not due to the faulty recollection he claimed in his second interview and in the disciplinary proceeding, but was rather a deliberate falsehood likely intended to protect a fellow officer who was dismissed from the force between petitioner's two interviews. No basis...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.