HILL v. NEW YORK HOSPITAL


277 A.D.2d 117 (2000)

716 N.Y.S.2d 568

CATHERINE HILL, Respondent, v. NEW YORK HOSPITAL et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided November 21, 2000.


A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the jury's findings of liability against defendant doctors for both medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, and against defendant hospital based on agency by estoppel (see, Sarivola v Brookdale Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 204 A.D.2d 245). The qualifications of plaintiff's medical expert went to the weight rather than the admissibility of his testimony, and his credibility was therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases