The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Contrary to defendant's argument, the evidence of defendant's identity, which included compelling physical evidence connecting defendant to the crime, was overwhelming.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The fact that defendant's position in the lineup did not correspond with his number card was the result of his own choice (see, People v Adams...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.