The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Probable cause was established by defendant's resemblance to the description provided by the undercover officer, coupled with defendant's presence in the location indicated by the undercover officer. Moreover, there was no one else at that location meeting the description.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's agency defense was disproved...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.