Plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant for the installation and operation of certain electronic surveillance devices. The contract provided that absent a further premium payment for indemnification, defendant would not be liable for damages resulting from a failure of the system. It is conceded that no such payment was made. Under the circumstances, defendant would only be liable for its gross negligence.
The court properly determined that defendant's conduct...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.