1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 216 F.3d
  5. 216 F.3d 109 (2000)
 

DETROIT TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO. 18 v. N.L.R.B.

Nos. 98-1599, 99-1111, 99-1112, 99-1163 and 99-1180.

216 F.3d 109 (2000)

DETROIT TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO. 18, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Detroit News, Inc., et al., Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided July 7, 2000.

As Revised August 18, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Coppess argued the cause for the Union petitioners. With him on the briefs were Samuel C. McKnight, Duane F. Ice, John G. Adam, and Richard Rosenblatt.

Jeremy P. Sherman argued the cause for the Employer petitioners. With him on on the briefs were Joshua L. Ditelberg and Kristin A. Michaels.

Sharon I. Block, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Leonard R. Page, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Charles Donnelly, Supervisory Attorney. John D. Burgoyne, Deputy Associate General Counsel, entered an appearance.

James B. Coppess argued the cause for the Union intervenors. With him on the brief were Samuel C. McKnight, Duane F. Ice, John G. Adam, and Barbara Camens.

Jeremy P. Sherman, Joshua L. Ditelberg and Kristin A. Michaels filed the brief for the Employer intervenors.

Before: SILBERMAN and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges, and BUCKLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.

SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Two groups of petitioners challenge National Labor Relations Board orders arising out of a strike against the Detroit newspapers. The employers challenge those portions of the Board's orders determining that they committed unfair labor practices, see Detroit Newspaper Agency, 326 N.L.R.B. No. 64 (1998) (Detroit I), on reconsideration, 327 N.L.R.B. No. 146...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases