1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 278 A.D.2d
  5. 278 A.D.2d 40 (2000)
 

CADLE COMPANY II, INC. v. KLAR

278 A.D.2d 40 (2000)

717 N.Y.S.2d 525

CADLE COMPANY II, INC., Respondent, v. RONALD M. KLAR, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 7, 2000.

Defendant's claim that plaintiff is a foreign corporation doing business in New York without authority, and is therefore maintaining this action in violation of Business Corporation Law § 1312, is unsupported by any evidence of systematic and regular activity (see, Alicanto, S.A. v Woolverton, 129 A.D.2d 601, 602; cf., Business Corporation Law § 1301 [b]). Nor does defendant offer any persuasive evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases