1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 156 F.Supp.2d
  5. 156 F.Supp.2d 153 (2000)
 

DADDONA v. GAUDIO

No. 399CV1251(JBA).

156 F.Supp.2d 153 (2000)

Paul R. DADDONA v. Maxine GAUDIO, et al.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

September 8, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R. Daddona, Stamford, CT, Pro se.

Maxine Gaudio, Greenwich, CT, Pro se.

Geoffrey Brandner, Stamford, CT, Pro se.

Phillip B. Swaim, New Canaan, CT, Michael T. Ryan, Ryan, Ryan, Johnson & Deluca, Stamford, CT, David J. Sheldon, U.S. Attorney's Office, New Haven, CT, for Defendants.

RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS

ARTERTON, District Judge.

Overview:

In this case, pro se plaintiff Paul R. Daddona alleges that the defendants, Phillip Swaim, Maxine Gaudio, Geoffrey Brandner, Judge Alvin W. Thompson and the United States1 engaged in twenty-two "acts of racketeering" in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(b)-(d), and that plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases