1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 106 F.Supp.2d
  5. 106 F.Supp.2d 189 (2000)
 

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. TYMANN

Civ.A.No. 00-11205-EFH.

106 F.Supp.2d 189 (2000)

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. Daniel B. TYMANN, Nathan J. Tymann, David B. Ashley, Karen M. Ashley, Visalkumar J. Patel, Meredith A. Hatten, Molly A. Broadley, Brenda A. Conkel, Michael A. Hickey and James F. Wholley, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

August 1, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael B. Keating, Foley, Hoag & Eliot, Boston, MA, for Lucent Technologies, Inc., Plaintiffs.

Geoffrey R. Bok, Stoneman, Chandler & Miller, Boston, Franklin Brockway Gowdy, Gregory Louis Lippetz, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, CA, for Daniel B. Tymann, Nathan J. Tymann, David B. Ashley, Karen M. Ashley, Vimalkumar J. Patel, Meredith A. Hatten, Molly A. Broadly, Brenda A. Conkel, Michael A. Hickey, James F. Wholley, Defendants.

ORDER

HARRINGTON, District Judge.

The Court has heard oral argument on July 24, July 25 and July 26, 2000, on Plaintiff Lucent Technologies, Inc.'s Motion for Preliminary Injunction to enforce its "non-competition" and "non-disclosure" agreements against the ten named defendants, its former employees, now employed by plaintiff's competitor, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Lucent Technologies, Inc.,and Cisco Systems, Inc., are both involved in the optical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases