1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 123 F.Supp.2d
  5. 123 F.Supp.2d 169 (2000)
 

IN RE TEXACO INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LIT.

No. 96 Civ. 8343 (CLB).

123 F.Supp.2d 169 (2000)

In re TEXACO INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 1, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Rand, New York City, pro se.

U. Seth Ottensoser, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, New York City, for Shareholder plaintiffs.

Seth Goodchild, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York City, for defendant Officers & Directors of Texaco.

Glendora, White Plains, NY, shareholder pro se.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

BRIEANT, District Judge.

By motion filed on October 30, 2000, heard and fully submitted on December 1, 2000, which motion was not invited by this Court or the Court of Appeals, Objector William C. Rand, who has appeared pro se in this Court and in the Court of Appeals, but happens to be an attorney, moves for an award of attorney's fees and expenses incurred in the course of his pro se Objection in both Courts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases