The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence warranted the inference that appellant knew that the property in question was stolen and not merely the subject of a dispute as to its ownership. Although appellant was not present for the actual theft, the evidence established that appellant received a stolen watch from another juvenile, while the complainant was still screaming for its return, and then...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.