IN RE STANLEY D.

(AC 20366)

61 Conn. App. 224 (2000)

IN RE STANLEY D.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released December 26, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond J. Rigat, with whom, on the brief, was Matthew T. Gilbride, for the appellant (respondent father).

Mary K. Lenehan, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Susan T. Pearlman, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (petitioner).

Schaller, Spear and O'Connell, JS.


Opinion

SPEAR, J.

The respondent father appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights1 with respect to his minor child, S, pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-112. The respondent's sole claim is that the court improperly found that he had failed to achieve sufficient personal rehabilitation within the meaning of § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B).2 We affirm the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases