1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 85 F.Supp.2d
  5. 85 F.Supp.2d 198 (2000)
 

SAUER v. XEROX CORP.

No. 95-CV-6485L.

85 F.Supp.2d 198 (2000)

Fred SAUER, Plaintiff, v. XEROX CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

February 24, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon Locke, Gordon Locke Law Offices, New Rochelle, NY, for Fred Sauer, plaintiff.

John P. Coffey, Latham & Watkins, Newark, NJ, E. Marcellus Williamson, Latham & Watkins, Washington, DC, for Xerox Corporation, defendants.

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This action arises out of a dispute over certain industrial equipment ("the equipment") between plaintiff Fred Sauer and defendant Xerox Corporation. In a letter to the court dated August 31, 1999, Xerox requested that the court issue an order disqualifying plaintiff's attorney, Gordon Locke, from continuing to represent plaintiff in this action. The basis for defendant's request was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases