1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 10 P.3d
  5. 10 P.3d 251 (2000)
 

MEEK v. GRAY

(SC S47798)

10 P.3d 251 (2000)

331 Or. 21

Daniel MEEK, Petitioner, v. Roger GRAY, Becky Miller, Margaret Olney, Bill Sizemore, Cecil Tibbets, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided September 8, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel W. Meek, Portland, pro se, argued the cause and filed the petition.

Margaret Olney, Portland, argued the cause and filed the memoranda for respondent Roger Gray and for herself as respondent.

Gregory W. Byrne, Portland, argued the cause for respondents Becky Miller and Bill Sizemore.

Cecil Tibbets, Salem, pro se, argued the cause.

GILLETTE, J.

In this original proceeding, petitioner challenges the explanatory statement for Ballot Measure 98 (2000). See ORS 251.205 (providing for creation and manner of selection of committee of five citizens to prepare explanatory statement for initiated and referred measures); ORS 251.215 (providing for preparation and filing of explanatory statement by committee). The initiative measure would amend Article XV of the Oregon Constitution by adding a restriction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases