1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 8 P.3d
  5. 8 P.3d 204 (2000)
 

MACY v. BLATCHFORD

(CC 9407-04746; CA A93045; SC S45678).

8 P.3d 204 (2000)

330 Or. 444

Danita J. MACY and Lawrence B. Macy, Petitioners on Review, v. Douglas M. BLATCHFORD, M.D., Respondent on Review, and Phillip S. Alberts, M.D., Defendant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided August 3, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathryn H. Clarke, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners on review.

Lindsey H. Hughes, of Keating Jones Bildstein Hughes & Yelnosky, P.C., Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.

D. Lawrence Wobbrock, Michael Banks, and Robert K. Udziela, of Pozzi Wilson Atchison LLP, Portland, filed the briefs for amicus curiae Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.

GILLETTE, J.

In this medical malpractice action, plaintiffs Danita and Lawrence Macy challenge a trial court ruling that prevented them from introducing evidence at trial that Dr. Blatchford (defendant) had a sexual relationship with Danita Macy1 at the time when the Macys assert that he negligently treated her for persistent and debilitating pelvic pain. The Court of Appeals affirmed that ruling, specifically holding that the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases