1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 61 Conn.
  5. 61 Conn. App. 106 (2000)
 

RUSSELL v. RUSSELL

(AC 20631)

61 Conn. App. 106 (2000)

SHERRY RUSSELL v. KENNETH M. RUSSELL

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released December 12, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth M. Russell, pro se, the appellant (defendant), filed a brief.

Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Lucia Szarzanowicz Ziobro and Donald M. Longley, assistant attorneys general, filed a brief for the appellee (state).

Rhonda M. Morra filed a brief for the minor children.

Schaller, Zarella and Pellegrino, Js.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The pro se defendant, Kenneth M. Russell, appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of a family support magistrate to deny his motion for modification of a child support order. The sole issue on appeal is whether the court improperly determined that the defendant failed to demonstrate a change in circumstances that would justify modification.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases