1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 749 A.2d
  5. 749 A.2d 852 (2000)
 

RUNYON v. SMITH

749 A.2d 852 (2000)

163 N.J. 439

Diane RUNYON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Maureen B. SMITH, Ph.D and Psychological Associates, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 10, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Gonzo, for defendants-appellants (Harwood Lloyd, attorneys).

Charles J. Lange, Jr., for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons set forth in its comprehensive opinion. Runyon v. Smith, 322 N.J.Super. 236, 730 A.2d 881 (1999). We add these observations to clarify the basis for our disposition and to address the concerns of our dissenting colleagues.

We recognize the dissent's concern about instances in which the psychologistpatient privilege must yield...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases