1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 730 N.E.2d
  5. 730 N.E.2d 840 (2000)
 

ADAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVENUE

No. 49T10-9904-TA-00024.

730 N.E.2d 840 (2000)

Dante ADAMS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVENUE, Respondent.

Tax Court of Indiana.

June 5, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Hammerle, Joseph M. Cleary, Hammerle Foster Allen & Long-Sharp, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Petitioners.

Karen M. Freeman-Wilson, Attorney General of Indiana, David A. Arthur, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Respondent.

FISHER, J.

The petitioner, Dante Adams (Adams), challenges the Department of State Revenue's (Department) finding that Adams owes controlled substance excise tax (CSET) in the amount of $159,096.00. Adams raises several issues for this Court's review; however, because one of the issues is dispositive, the Court addresses only that issue: whether the exclusionary rule of evidence applies to this proceeding, thereby making the CSET assessment invalid.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases