PACIULAN v. GEORGE

No. 99-15687.

229 F.3d 1226 (2000)

Richard J. PACIULAN; William A. Kruse, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ronald M. GEORGE, Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court; Stanley Mosk; Joyce L. Kennard; Marvin R. Baxter; Kathryn Mickle Werdegar; Janice R. Wrong; Ming W. Chin; Judy Johnson; Jerome Braun, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed October 17, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph R. Giannini, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Peter K. Southworth, Sacramento, California, Colin P. Wong, San Francisco, California, for the defendants-appellees.

Before: RUGGERO J. ALDISERT, SUSAN P. GRABER and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges.


Argued and Submitted September 14, 2000 — San Francisco, California

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Richard J. Paciulan and William A. Kruse sued defendants, Justices of the California Supreme Court and individuals from the State Bar of California, challenging the constitutionality of California's rules regulating pro hac vice admission to practice in California courts, as codified in California Rule of Court 983 ("Rule 983").1 The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases