Order unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum:
In light of the ability of each party to bear his or her own legal and experts' fees, and given defendant's prior contribution of $7,500 toward such fees incurred by plaintiff, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the application to require defendant to pay plaintiff's outstanding legal and expert fees (see, Kamerman v Kamerman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.