1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 95 F.Supp.2d
  5. 95 F.Supp.2d 1155 (2000)
 

ECRIX CORP. v. EXABYTE CORP.

No. Civ.A. 99-K-1151.

95 F.Supp.2d 1155 (2000)

ECRIX CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. EXABYTE CORPORATION, Defendant and Counter-Claimant.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

May 10, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel S. Hoffman, Barbara Z. Blumenthal, Hoffman Reilly Pozner & Williamson LLP, Denver, CO, David J. Lee, Daniel N. Fishman, Chrisman, Bynum & Johnson, P.C., Boulder, CO, for plaintiff and counter-defendant.

Nancy J. Gegenheimer, Linnea Brown, Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, Denver, CO, George G. Matava, Brian A. Carpenter, LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P., Denver, CO, for defendant and counter-claimant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, Senior District Judge.

Ecrix Corporation's ("Ecrix") original complaint requested a declaratory judgment that it was not infringing any of Exabyte Corporation's ("Exabyte") patents. Ecrix manufactures helical-scan drives for recording computer data.1 Exabyte has at least seven patents on methods of recording and reading helically-recorded data. Ecrix filed an amended complaint that in addition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases