1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 91 F.Supp.2d
  5. 91 F.Supp.2d 1112 (2000)
 

JRB COMPANY, INC. v. PEMBERTON, INC.

No. 5:99-CV-1236.

91 F.Supp.2d 1112 (2000)

JRB COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. PEMBERTON, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

March 6, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laura J. Gentilcore, Ray L. Weber, Renner, Kenner, Greive, Bobak, Taylor & Weber, Akron, OH, for JRB Company Inc., plaintiff.

Mark J. Skakun, III, Louis F. Wagner, Walter A. Lucas, Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, Akron, OH, Robert W. Duckworth, Holland & Knight, Orlando, FL, for Pemberton Inc., defendant.

George W. Rooney, Jr., Roetzel & Andress, Cleveland, OH, for George W. Rooney, Jr., neutral.

ORDER

GWIN, District Judge.

On February 7, 2000, Defendant Pemberton, Inc., filed a motion for summary judgment in this patent infringement action [Doc. 36]. With its motion, Pemberton says Plaintiff JRB Company's United States Patent No. 4,708,579 ("the '579 patent") was invalid for lack of novelty and was not infringed. Alternatively, Defendant Pemberton says Plaintiff JRB Company cannot recover damages arising before the filing of this action due to laches...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases