1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 91 F.Supp.2d
  5. 91 F.Supp.2d 1106 (2000)
 

CHINA TIRE HOLDINGS v. GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER

No. 5:99-CV-3163.

91 F.Supp.2d 1106 (2000)

CHINA TIRE HOLDINGS LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

March 3, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joshua B Nathanson, Mark B Cohn, McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Haiman, Cleveland, OH, Peter J McNulty, Los Angeles, CA, for China Tire Holdings Limited, Plaintiffs.

Charles A Gilman, Cahill, Gordon & Reindel, New York, NY, Karen K Grasso, Mark J. Skakun, Walter A Lucas, Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, Akron, OH, for Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Goodyear International Corporation, Defendants.

OPINION

GWIN, District Judge.

On January 14, 2000, Defendants Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and Goodyear International Corporation collectively filed a motion to dismiss the claims asserted against them by Plaintiff China Tire Holdings Limited [Doc. 4]. In their motion, the defendants say the plaintiff's claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata or claim preclusion. Alternatively, the defendants contend that the plaintiff has failed to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases