1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 208 F.3d
  5. 208 F.3d 981 (2000)
 

VIEW ENGINEERING v. ROBOTIC VISION SYSTEMS

No. 99-1399.

208 F.3d 981 (2000)

VIEW ENGINEERING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBOTIC VISION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant, and Morrison Law Firm, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 29, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernie L. Brooks, Brooks & Kushman, P.C., of Southfield, Michigan, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was Frank A. Angileri.

David L. Just, Lucas & Just, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Donald C. Lucas.

Before MICHAEL, LOURIE, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

MICHAEL, Circuit Judge.

The Morrison Law Firm ("Morrison") appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California sanctioning Morrison under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See View Eng'g, Inc. v. Robotic Vision Sys., Inc., No. CV 95-1882 (C.D.Ca. Apr. 14, 1999). On March 24, 1995, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky and Walker, on behalf of View Engineering, Inc. ("View"), filed a claim for declaratory relief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases