1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 114 F.Supp.2d
  5. 114 F.Supp.2d 1070 (2000)
 

IN RE INDEPENDENT SERV. ORGANIZATIONS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

No. CIV. A. 94-2502, No. MDL-1021.

114 F.Supp.2d 1070 (2000)

In re INDEPENDENT SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Applies To Creative Copier Services v. Xerox Corp.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

February 16, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Hennefer, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Peter K. Bleakley, Arnold & Porter, Washington, DC, Frederick Brown, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, CA, Peter W. Marshall, Xerox Corporation, Stamford, CT, C. Larry O'Rourke, E. Robert Yoches, Vincent P. Kovalick, Leslie I. Bookoff, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Washington, DC, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VRATIL, District Judge.

Creative Copier Services ("CCS") filed suit against Xerox Corporation, alleging that it violated the federal antitrust laws and state competition laws by refusing to sell copier parts to independent service organizations, tying its sale of parts and service, and disparaging CCS. Xerox filed a counterclaim alleging that CCS had infringed Xerox patents for various copier parts, Xerox copyrights for service...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases