1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 96 F.Supp.2d
  5. 96 F.Supp.2d 1053 (2000)
 

SELBY v. NEW LINE CINEMA CORP.

No. CV99-12633 AHM(AIJx).

96 F.Supp.2d 1053 (2000)

William SELBY, Plaintiff, v. NEW LINE CINEMA CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

March 6, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glen L. Kulik, Kulik Gottesman & Mouton, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff.

Kathryn A. Young, Rosenfeld Meyer & Susman, Beverly Hills, CA, for Defendants.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

MATZ, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on the motion of defendants New Line Cinema Corporation ("New Line") and Toby Emmerich ("Emmerich") to dismiss plaintiff William Selby's ("Selby") causes of action for violation of the Lanham Act and breach of implied-in-fact contract pursuant to F.R...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases