1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 96 F.Supp.2d
  5. 96 F.Supp.2d 1042 (2000)
 

3M UNITEK CORP. v. ORMCO CO.

No. 99-10099-RAP(EX).

96 F.Supp.2d 1042 (2000)

3M UNITEK CORPORATION, 3M Innovative Properties Company and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants, v. ORMCO COMPANY, Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff. And Related Counterclaim

United States District Court, C.D. California.

February 24, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Streff, Kevin H. Rhodes, Bruce O. Bradford and Marc H. Cohen of Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, IL, for plaintiffs.

J. Robert Chambers, Donald F. Frei and Theodore R. Remaklus of Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P., Cincinnati, OH, for defendants.

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

PAEZ, District JUDGE.

I.

Introduction

Plaintiffs 3M Unitek Corporation, 3M Innovative Properties Company and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (collectively "3M Unitek") are seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent defendant from continuing to sell its "inspire!" ceramic orthodontic brackets for use in orthodontic braces. Plaintiffs argue that the defendant's bracket infringes on plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases