1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 94 F.Supp.2d
  5. 94 F.Supp.2d 18 (2000)
 

COLEMAN v. PENSION BEN. GUAR. CORP.

No. 99-278 SSH.

94 F.Supp.2d 18 (2000)

Richard COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

March 21, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan S. Sauntry, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs.

Jeffrey Bruce Cohen, Nancy Snyder Heermans, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for defendant.

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court are defendant's motion to dismiss, plaintiffs' opposition thereto, defendant's reply, and plaintiffs' surreply. Upon consideration of the entire record, the Court denies defendant's motion. Although findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rule 12 or 56, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); Summers v. Department of Justice, 140...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases