1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 163 F.Supp.2d
  5. 163 F.Supp.2d 870 (2000)
 

DOE v. DEPALMA

No. C-3-99-449.

163 F.Supp.2d 870 (2000)

John DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Frank DEPALMA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

August 31, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Roger Leonard, Dayton, OH, for Plaintiffs.

Janet Kay Cooper, Cooper & Gentile Co., Dayton, OH, for Defendants.

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. # 7-1); DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 7-2) OVERRULED, AS MOOT; PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT (DOC. # 1) DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT, WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS FROM DATE; PLAINTIFFS' FAILURE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS

RICE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs John and Jane Doe are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases