1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 95 N.Y.2d
  5. 95 N.Y.2d 924 (2000)
 

PEOPLE v. VALERIO

95 N.Y.2d 924 (2000)

744 N.E.2d 136

721 N.Y.S.2d 601

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM A. VALERIO, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 28, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Michael H. Sussman, Goshen (Stephen Bergstein of counsel), for appellant.

Donna M. Cathy, District Attorney of Seneca County, Waterloo, for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY and ROSENBLATT concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determinations regarding the scope of the initial stop, the questioning of defendant about the clothing in his trunk, defendant's consent to search the vehicle, the inventory search and the use of a drug-sniffing dog to search the vehicle all involve mixed questions of law and fact. Inasmuch as those determinations are supported by evidence in the record, they are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases