1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 55 F.Supp.2d
  5. 55 F.Supp.2d 43 (1999)
 

U.S. v. PEARSON PLC

No. Civ.A. 98-2836(JR).

55 F.Supp.2d 43 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America v. PEARSON PLC, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

June 30, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joyce L. Bartoo, John W. Poole, David C. Kully, Ahmed E. Taha, U.S. Department of Justice, for U.S.

Robert S. Schlossberg, Thomas J. Klotz, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, DC, for defendants Pearson plc and Pearson Inc.

MEMORANDUM

ROBERTSON, District Judge.

Before the Court for the public interest determination required by the Tunney Act is a proposed final judgment giving effect to the terms of an antitrust consent decree between and among the United States Government, Pearson plc, Pearson Inc., and Viacom International, Inc. It appears, upon examination in light of the violations charged in the complaint, that the terms of the decree are not ambiguous, that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases