1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 90 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 90 Cal.Rptr.2d 876 (1999)
 

HAMMOND v. AGRAN

No. G024266.

90 Cal.Rptr.2d 876 (1999)

76 Cal.App.4th 1181

Barry HAMMOND, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Larry AGRAN, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

December 9, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth D. Agran and Jan Rainbird, Irvine, for Defendant and Appellant.

Megan L. Wagner, Irvine, and Barry Hammond, in pro. per., Sherman Oaks, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

The narrow issue on which this case turns is the scope of the word "qualifications" as used in the Elections Code statute governing the content of candidates' statements in voters' pamphlets. (See Elec.Code, § 13307, formerly Elec.Code, § 10012.) It is now established that the word does not encompass attacks on one's opponents. (See Clark v. Burleigh (1992)

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases