1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 93 N.Y.2d
  5. 93 N.Y.2d 864 (1999)
 

CHARLES v. ROGERS

93 N.Y.2d 864 (1999)

711 N.E.2d 198

689 N.Y.S.2d 13

In the Matter of CHARLES M. MOMAH, Appellant, v. KATHLEEN M. ROGERS, as St. Lawrence County Judge, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 25, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goldman & Hafetz, New York City (Lawrence S. Goldman and Elizabeth M. Johnson of counsel), for appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, Syracuse (Norman S. Hatt, Arthur G. Weinstein and Lawrence N. Gray of counsel), for respondents.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY and ROSENBLATT.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judgment affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., at the Appellate Division (239 A.D.2d 20

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases