OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge
Appellant challenges the district court's dismissal of its suit for failure to state a claim. Because appellant's subrogated right to recover damages for the medical assistance provided is prohibited by the Dramshop Act, we affirm.
FACTS
Since this case arises from the dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim, we accept appellant's description of the facts as true. D.A.B. v. Brown,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.