1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 82 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 82 Cal.Rptr.2d 808 (1999)
 

ABBOTT v. MANDIOLA

No. G021145.

82 Cal.Rptr.2d 808 (1999)

70 Cal.App.4th 676

Marshall R. ABBOTT, Plaintiff and Respondent v. Sergio MANDIOLA, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

March 5, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Baker, Silberberg & Keener, Marshall Silberg, Mark V. Franzen, Irvine; Thelen, Reid & Priest, Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, Curtis A. Cole, William F. Holbrook and Matthew S. Levinson, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.

Hurst & Hurst, Debra L. Hurst; and Susan W. Garrett, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

Sometimes, because of congested court dockets and scheduling difficulties, the "direct calendar" judge who is assigned a case for all purposes is not the judge who conducts the trial. Such a reassignment can lead, as happened in the present case, to trouble. Certain pairs of proceedings must be heard by the same judge if he or she is able to do so: for example, trials and new trial motions. (See Code Civ. Proc, § 661.) The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases