1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 41 F.Supp.2d
  5. 41 F.Supp.2d 768 (1999)
 

BRUNE v. BASF CORP.

No. C-1-97-811.

41 F.Supp.2d 768 (1999)

Janet BRUNE, et al. Plaintiffs, v. BASF CORPORATION Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

January 15, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randolph Harry Freking, Freking & Betz, Cincinnati, OH, Carrie Atkins Barron, Freking & Betz, Cincinnati, OH, for plaintiffs.

Rosemary Doreen Canton, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Cincinnati, OH, for defendant.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DLOTT, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. # 11), pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs Janet Brune and Deanna Ashing filed this suit against their former employer, Defendant BASF Corporation, following their terminations. In their Second Amended Complaint (doc. #8), Plaintiffs raise the following claims against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases