1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 95 F.Supp.2d
  5. 95 F.Supp.2d 706 (1999)
 

FRANK v. CITY OF AKRON

No. 5:98CV2862.

95 F.Supp.2d 706 (1999)

John V. FRANK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF AKRON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

December 2, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Gippin, Karen M. Doty, Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, Akron, OH, for plaintiffs.

Cheri B. Cunningham, Max Rothal, City Of Akron, Law Department, Akron, OH, for Akron, City of, defendant.

Warner DeWitt Mendenhall, III, Akron, OH, for Bruce Kilby, Mike Parsons, Patricia Longville, intervenors-defendants.

Brian J. Williams, Akron, OH, for Yes on Issue 11 Campaign, Gregory D. Coleridge, intervenors-defendants.

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

POLSTER, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment challenging a campaign finance reform amendment to the City of Akron's Charter passed by ballot initiative in November 1998 (Doc. No. 36). Defendant City of Akron has filed a response (Doc. No. 44), as have Intervening Defendants "Yes on Issue 11 Campaign" and Gregory D. Coleridge (Doc. No. 57), and Intervening Defendants Mike Parsons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases