1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 527 U.S.
  5. 527 U.S. 198 (1999)
 

CUNNINGHAM v. HAMILTON COUNTY

No. 98-727.

527 U.S. 198 (1999)

119 S.Ct. 1915

144 L.Ed.2d 184

CUNNINGHAM v. HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 14, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Goldstein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Jonathan D. Schiller and Teresa L. Cunningham.

John J. Arnold argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Carl J. Stich and Shannon M. Reynolds.

Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Kennedy, J., filed a concurring opinion, p. 210.

Justice Thomas, delivered the opinion of the Court.

Federal courts of appeals ordinarily have jurisdiction over appeals from "final decisions of the district courts." 28 U. S. C. § 1291. This case presents the question whether an order imposing sanctions on an attorney pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(4) is a final decision. We hold that it is not, even where, as here, the attorney no longer represents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases