1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 40 F.Supp.2d
  5. 40 F.Supp.2d 623 (1999)
 

U.S. v. HSU

No. Crim.A. 97-323-01.

40 F.Supp.2d 623 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America v. Kai-Lo HSU.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

March 11, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman E. Greenspan, Ian M. Comisky, Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Stephen R. LaCheen, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant.

Louis Lappen, J. Alvin Stout, III, Asst. U.S. Atty's, Philadelphia, PA, for U.S.

MEMORANDUM

DALZELL, District Judge.

Defendant Kai-Lo Hsu argues that the recently-enacted Economic Espionage Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1831 et seq. ("EEA"), is unconstitutionally vague. Hsu's motion to dismiss the EEA charges in Counts Ten and Eleven of the Indictment raises serious concerns about the scope and clarity of the EEA that we at some length address here.1

Defendant's Vagueness Argument

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases