1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 56 F.Supp.2d
  5. 56 F.Supp.2d 580 (1999)
 

BOSTICK v. ITT HARTFORD GROUP, INC.

No. CIV. A. 97-CV-6296.

56 F.Supp.2d 580 (1999)

Shirley BOSTICK and Adrienne Bostick, Plaintiffs, v. ITT HARTFORD GROUP, INC. a/k/a and/or d/b/a as ITT Hartford, and/or the Hartford, and Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, Defendants,

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

July 27, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil E. Jokelson, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs.

Patrick J. Keenan, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM

LOWELL A. REED, Senior District Judge.

Presently before the court is the motion of defendant ITT Hartford Groups, Inc. ("Hartford") for summary judgment (Document No. 22) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), the memorandum of plaintiffs in opposition thereto (Document No. 23) and the reply of Hartford (Document No. 25). Based on the following analysis, the motion of Hartford will...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases