1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 77 F.Supp.2d
  5. 77 F.Supp.2d 475 (1999)
 

HARTZOG v. REEBOK INTERN. LTD.

No. 99 CIV. 10850(LAK).

77 F.Supp.2d 475 (1999)

David HARTZOG, Plaintiff, v. REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LTD., et ano., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 16, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Hartzog, pro se.

Scott J. Wenner, Christina L. Feege, Littler Mendelson, New York City, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this pro se employment discrimination action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, against Reebok International, Ltd. ("Reebok") and The Rockport Company, Inc. ("Rockport"). Reebok, which is the parent company of Rockport, employed plaintiff from 1995 until some time in 1997. Rockport subsequently employed him as a retail sales person...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases