1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 520 S.E.2d
  5. 520 S.E.2d 13 (1999)
 

SMITH v. STATE

No. A99A1537.

520 S.E.2d 13 (1999)

238 Ga. App. 605

SMITH v. The STATE.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

June 22, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel N. Shiver, Athens, for appellant.

Harry N. Gordon, District Attorney, William W. Tanner, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

A jury found Donald Smith guilty of being a "peeping Tom." OCGA § 16-11-61. His motion for new trial was denied by the trial court, and this appeal followed. We affirm.

1. Smith contends the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's verdict. We disagree. The term "peeping Tom" is defined as "a person who peeps through windows or doors ... for the purpose of spying upon or invading the privacy of the persons spied upon and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases