SPIER v. CALZATURIFICIO TECNICA, S.P.A.

No. 86 Civ. 3447(CSH).

77 F.Supp.2d 405 (1999)

Martin I. SPIER, Petitioner, v. CALZATURIFICIO TECNICA, S.P.A. Respondent.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 29, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald L. Kreindler, Phillips Nizer Benjamin Krim & Ballon LLP, New York City, David R. Foley, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON REARGUMENT

HAIGHT, Senior District Judge.

Petitioner I. Martin Spier moves for reargument of this Court's Opinion dated October 22, 1999 ("the Opinion"), denying his petition to enforce an arbitration award. Familiarity with the Opinion is assumed. For the reasons that follow, Spier's motion for rearguement is denied.

On his present motion, Spier invokes Local Civil Rule 6.3. Rule 6.3 requires the moving party...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases