1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 69 F.Supp.2d
  5. 69 F.Supp.2d 404 (1999)
 

XEROX CORP. v. 3COM CORP.

No. 97-CV-6182T.

69 F.Supp.2d 404 (1999)

XEROX CORP., Plaintiff, v. 3COM CORPORATION, U.S. Robotics Corporation, U.S. Robotics Access Corp., and Palm Computing, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

February 18, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry P. Trueheart, III, Richard D. Rochford, Nixon, Peabody LLP, Rochester, NY, James A. Oliff, Darle M. Short, Edward P. Walker, Michael S. Culver, Richard E. Rice, Oliff & Berridge, Alexandria, VA, Michael F. Orman, Nixon, Peabody LLP, Rochester, NY, Christine M. Hoeft, Oliff & Berridge, Alexandria, VA, for plaintiff.

Joseph A. Regan, Faraci, Lange, Johns, Regan & Schwarz, LLP, Rochester, NY, Bradley J. Hulbert, James C. Gumina, Curtis J. Whitenack, Christopher M. Cavan, Thomas E. Wetterman, McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert & Berghof, Chicago, IL, for defendants.

DECISION and ORDER

TELESCA, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Xerox Corp. ("Xerox"), alleges that the defendants willfully infringed and continue to infringe on U.S.Patent No. 5,596,656 (the " '656 patent") held by Xerox. By Decision and Order dated September 29, 1998, this Court denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment and granted the plaintiff's cross-motion for partial summary judgment, finding that the patent at issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases